To Kelly
Question:
I’ll save you the heartache and will most > likely be un-subscribing from this newsgroup anyway. Dealing with the likes > of you two is really not worth my time, or any effort I put into this group.
geesh, this is gonna turn into one of these little skits that always goes on when someone starts thinking *they* are more important then purpose of the group….before long people will be begging little kelly to stay…finally she’ll relent and say "oh okay, i guess i’ll stay…it really doesn’t matter what some people think….as long as the rest of you support me and love me" save the drama for daytime tv…. best regards, connie
Response:
If people I respected would like proof, then I would be more than willing (my references letters from the vets I work with, my acceptence letter, etc.). But quite frankly Beth, I could give two shits about what you or Megan think and I have no respect for either of you. So why should I care? Anyway, this is ridiculous and my cat is really sick so I have more important things to worry about. I’ll save you the heartache and will most likely be un-subscribing from this newsgroup anyway. Dealing with the likes of you two is really not worth my time, or any effort I put into this group. Have a good one, Kelly — *When in doubt, See a Vet! – Nothing else substitutes for a professional.*
– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> Believe whatever you like Megan. I don’t have to prove anything to you or > anybody else. > Some fraudulent claims are more serious than others. Anyone claiming to be > a veterinarian, or a veterinary student, while giving advice about cat > health on a cat health newsgroup, really ought to be able to back their > claim up, IMO, but I don’t see how you possibly could do that, given the > information Megan obtained from the vet school about their eligibility > requirements. > How is falsely claiming to be a veterinary student (or even a soon-to-be > veterinary student) any different from falsely claiming to be a > veterinarian, except perhaps as a matter of degree? To try to deceive > others by making either claim is bad enough, but to do so in order to try to > get people to listen to your advice about their cats’ health is downright > reprehensible. It would be bad enough if you consistently exercised good > judgment and gave sound advice, but you exacerbate the problem by frequently > giving unsound advice. > You’re right in one respect, Kelly. You don’t have to prove anything on > Usenet. You aren’t bound by any legal constraints that I am aware of; > you’re free to make any claims about yourself that you want to. It’s just > too bad that you don’t appear to be bound by any ethical ones either, such > as telling the truth. So I guess it’s up to the rest of us to beware of > your claims and your advice, and to take both with a huge grain of salt. > There is an excellent object lesson here: No one should take anything they > read on a newsgroup at face value. It’s good to be reminded of that every > once in a while.
Response:
> Believe whatever you like Megan. I don’t have to prove anything to you or > anybody else.
Some fraudulent claims are more serious than others. Anyone claiming to be a veterinarian, or a veterinary student, while giving advice about cat health on a cat health newsgroup, really ought to be able to back their claim up, IMO, but I don’t see how you possibly could do that, given the information Megan obtained from the vet school about their eligibility requirements. How is falsely claiming to be a veterinary student (or even a soon-to-be veterinary student) any different from falsely claiming to be a veterinarian, except perhaps as a matter of degree? To try to deceive others by making either claim is bad enough, but to do so in order to try to get people to listen to your advice about their cats’ health is downright reprehensible. It would be bad enough if you consistently exercised good judgment and gave sound advice, but you exacerbate the problem by frequently giving unsound advice. You’re right in one respect, Kelly. You don’t have to prove anything on Usenet. You aren’t bound by any legal constraints that I am aware of; you’re free to make any claims about yourself that you want to. It’s just too bad that you don’t appear to be bound by any ethical ones either, such as telling the truth. So I guess it’s up to the rest of us to beware of your claims and your advice, and to take both with a huge grain of salt. There is an excellent object lesson here: No one should take anything they read on a newsgroup at face value. It’s good to be reminded of that every once in a while.
Response:
Hey you just proved my point! Thanks! Believe whatever you like Megan. I don’t have to prove anything to you or anybody else. Nor does anyone else in these newsgroups. I’m sorry that your so jealous of me, but that’s about all I’m sorry for. Have a nice life, Kelly — *When in doubt, See a Vet! – Nothing else substitutes for a professional.*
– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text ->I’m starting vet school this Sept, Beth & >yourself is a psychoobsessive twit who >enjoys prying into newsgroup members >personal lives and gives her ego a boost >by putting other people down. Who would >you be more apt to listen to? > I would listen to Beth. > Not some lying little twit who makes up stories to boost her credibiity, > and continuously posts false, sometimes harmful information. > You are not starting vet school, Kelly. I’ve been here much longer than > you have and I remember things. You only started University last year, > and you need at least TWO years before you can apply to vet school. > There is no way you could apply for, or be accepted into, vet school > when you only have one year of University to your credit. > You have posted numerous things that back up what I am saying: > "I’ll be going into Guelph University this year, and have plans of > applying and (hopefully!) being accepted into the Ontario Veterinary > College after two years of university." > "BTW I’m going into second year University in the fall – majoring in > Zoology, hoping to be accepted into vet school" > On 6/22/2001 (just 3 months later) you blatantly lied and posted the > following: > "I’ve taken 2 years undergraduate in Zoology at the University of > Guelph, and I’ve just been recently accepted into the Ontario Veterinary > College for the Fall 2001 semester. Needless to say, I’m extremely > excited at the opportunity!" > Recently accepted? How is that possible? Applications from (at a > minimum) "second" year students were due by February 1, and the results > of your school year were due by June 15. Decisions about and > notifications to who is accepted were not made until mid to late July, > so there is NO WAY you could have been accepted by June 22 (the date you > posted the above), and especially not with only "one" year of > University. According to the Vet School admissions policy, the earliest > you could apply would be for the February 2002 deadline, and even then, > you would just barely meet their minimum requirements for eligibility. > This is despicable behavior on your part, especially considering that > you have spent the last two days trying to convince someone that > medication for epilepsy is a bad idea, and are doing so while making a > fraudulent claim that you have "been accepted to vet school" so that > some might assume your opinion is more valid. > You have crossed the line, Kelly. > Your lies and actions are inexcusable and beneath contempt. > Megan > "The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do > nothing." > -Edmund Burke > Learn The TRUTH About Declawing > http://www.stopdeclaw.com > Zuzu’s Cats Photo Album: > http://albums.photopoint.com/j/AlbumList?u=244574
Response:
>I’m starting vet school this Sept, Beth & >yourself is a psychoobsessive twit who >enjoys prying into newsgroup members >personal lives and gives her ego a boost >by putting other people down. Who would >you be more apt to listen to?
I would listen to Beth. Not some lying little twit who makes up stories to boost her credibiity, and continuously posts false, sometimes harmful information. You are not starting vet school, Kelly. I’ve been here much longer than you have and I remember things. You only started University last year, and you need at least TWO years before you can apply to vet school. There is no way you could apply for, or be accepted into, vet school when you only have one year of University to your credit. You have posted numerous things that back up what I am saying:
"I’ll be going into Guelph University this year, and have plans of applying and (hopefully!) being accepted into the Ontario Veterinary College after two years of university."
"BTW I’m going into second year University in the fall – majoring in Zoology, hoping to be accepted into vet school" On 6/22/2001 (just 3 months later) you blatantly lied and posted the following: "I’ve taken 2 years undergraduate in Zoology at the University of Guelph, and I’ve just been recently accepted into the Ontario Veterinary College for the Fall 2001 semester. Needless to say, I’m extremely excited at the opportunity!" Recently accepted? How is that possible? Applications from (at a minimum) "second" year students were due by February 1, and the results of your school year were due by June 15. Decisions about and notifications to who is accepted were not made until mid to late July, so there is NO WAY you could have been accepted by June 22 (the date you posted the above), and especially not with only "one" year of University. According to the Vet School admissions policy, the earliest you could apply would be for the February 2002 deadline, and even then, you would just barely meet their minimum requirements for eligibility. This is despicable behavior on your part, especially considering that you have spent the last two days trying to convince someone that medication for epilepsy is a bad idea, and are doing so while making a fraudulent claim that you have "been accepted to vet school" so that some might assume your opinion is more valid. You have crossed the line, Kelly. Your lies and actions are inexcusable and beneath contempt. Megan "The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing." -Edmund Burke Learn The TRUTH About Declawing http://www.stopdeclaw.com Zuzu’s Cats Photo Album: http://albums.photopoint.com/j/AlbumList?u=244574
Response:
I’ll save you the heartache and will most > likely be un-subscribing from this newsgroup anyway. Dealing with the likes > of you two is really not worth my time, or any effort I put into this group.
geesh, this is gonna turn into one of these little skits that always goes on when someone starts thinking *they* are more important then purpose of the group….before long people will be begging little kelly to stay…finally she’ll relent and say "oh okay, i guess i’ll stay…it really doesn’t matter what some people think….as long as the rest of you support me and love me" save the drama for daytime tv…. best regards, connie
Response:
If people I respected would like proof, then I would be more than willing (my references letters from the vets I work with, my acceptence letter, etc.). But quite frankly Beth, I could give two shits about what you or Megan think and I have no respect for either of you. So why should I care? Anyway, this is ridiculous and my cat is really sick so I have more important things to worry about. I’ll save you the heartache and will most likely be un-subscribing from this newsgroup anyway. Dealing with the likes of you two is really not worth my time, or any effort I put into this group. Have a good one, Kelly — *When in doubt, See a Vet! – Nothing else substitutes for a professional.*
– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> Believe whatever you like Megan. I don’t have to prove anything to you or > anybody else. > Some fraudulent claims are more serious than others. Anyone claiming to be > a veterinarian, or a veterinary student, while giving advice about cat > health on a cat health newsgroup, really ought to be able to back their > claim up, IMO, but I don’t see how you possibly could do that, given the > information Megan obtained from the vet school about their eligibility > requirements. > How is falsely claiming to be a veterinary student (or even a soon-to-be > veterinary student) any different from falsely claiming to be a > veterinarian, except perhaps as a matter of degree? To try to deceive > others by making either claim is bad enough, but to do so in order to try to > get people to listen to your advice about their cats’ health is downright > reprehensible. It would be bad enough if you consistently exercised good > judgment and gave sound advice, but you exacerbate the problem by frequently > giving unsound advice. > You’re right in one respect, Kelly. You don’t have to prove anything on > Usenet. You aren’t bound by any legal constraints that I am aware of; > you’re free to make any claims about yourself that you want to. It’s just > too bad that you don’t appear to be bound by any ethical ones either, such > as telling the truth. So I guess it’s up to the rest of us to beware of > your claims and your advice, and to take both with a huge grain of salt. > There is an excellent object lesson here: No one should take anything they > read on a newsgroup at face value. It’s good to be reminded of that every > once in a while.
Response:
> Believe whatever you like Megan. I don’t have to prove anything to you or > anybody else.
Some fraudulent claims are more serious than others. Anyone claiming to be a veterinarian, or a veterinary student, while giving advice about cat health on a cat health newsgroup, really ought to be able to back their claim up, IMO, but I don’t see how you possibly could do that, given the information Megan obtained from the vet school about their eligibility requirements. How is falsely claiming to be a veterinary student (or even a soon-to-be veterinary student) any different from falsely claiming to be a veterinarian, except perhaps as a matter of degree? To try to deceive others by making either claim is bad enough, but to do so in order to try to get people to listen to your advice about their cats’ health is downright reprehensible. It would be bad enough if you consistently exercised good judgment and gave sound advice, but you exacerbate the problem by frequently giving unsound advice. You’re right in one respect, Kelly. You don’t have to prove anything on Usenet. You aren’t bound by any legal constraints that I am aware of; you’re free to make any claims about yourself that you want to. It’s just too bad that you don’t appear to be bound by any ethical ones either, such as telling the truth. So I guess it’s up to the rest of us to beware of your claims and your advice, and to take both with a huge grain of salt. There is an excellent object lesson here: No one should take anything they read on a newsgroup at face value. It’s good to be reminded of that every once in a while.
Response:
Hey you just proved my point! Thanks! Believe whatever you like Megan. I don’t have to prove anything to you or anybody else. Nor does anyone else in these newsgroups. I’m sorry that your so jealous of me, but that’s about all I’m sorry for. Have a nice life, Kelly — *When in doubt, See a Vet! – Nothing else substitutes for a professional.*
– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text ->I’m starting vet school this Sept, Beth & >yourself is a psychoobsessive twit who >enjoys prying into newsgroup members >personal lives and gives her ego a boost >by putting other people down. Who would >you be more apt to listen to? > I would listen to Beth. > Not some lying little twit who makes up stories to boost her credibiity, > and continuously posts false, sometimes harmful information. > You are not starting vet school, Kelly. I’ve been here much longer than > you have and I remember things. You only started University last year, > and you need at least TWO years before you can apply to vet school. > There is no way you could apply for, or be accepted into, vet school > when you only have one year of University to your credit. > You have posted numerous things that back up what I am saying: > "I’ll be going into Guelph University this year, and have plans of > applying and (hopefully!) being accepted into the Ontario Veterinary > College after two years of university." > "BTW I’m going into second year University in the fall – majoring in > Zoology, hoping to be accepted into vet school" > On 6/22/2001 (just 3 months later) you blatantly lied and posted the > following: > "I’ve taken 2 years undergraduate in Zoology at the University of > Guelph, and I’ve just been recently accepted into the Ontario Veterinary > College for the Fall 2001 semester. Needless to say, I’m extremely > excited at the opportunity!" > Recently accepted? How is that possible? Applications from (at a > minimum) "second" year students were due by February 1, and the results > of your school year were due by June 15. Decisions about and > notifications to who is accepted were not made until mid to late July, > so there is NO WAY you could have been accepted by June 22 (the date you > posted the above), and especially not with only "one" year of > University. According to the Vet School admissions policy, the earliest > you could apply would be for the February 2002 deadline, and even then, > you would just barely meet their minimum requirements for eligibility. > This is despicable behavior on your part, especially considering that > you have spent the last two days trying to convince someone that > medication for epilepsy is a bad idea, and are doing so while making a > fraudulent claim that you have "been accepted to vet school" so that > some might assume your opinion is more valid. > You have crossed the line, Kelly. > Your lies and actions are inexcusable and beneath contempt. > Megan > "The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do > nothing." > -Edmund Burke > Learn The TRUTH About Declawing > http://www.stopdeclaw.com > Zuzu’s Cats Photo Album: > http://albums.photopoint.com/j/AlbumList?u=244574
Response:
>I’m starting vet school this Sept, Beth & >yourself is a psychoobsessive twit who >enjoys prying into newsgroup members >personal lives and gives her ego a boost >by putting other people down. Who would >you be more apt to listen to?
I would listen to Beth. Not some lying little twit who makes up stories to boost her credibiity, and continuously posts false, sometimes harmful information. You are not starting vet school, Kelly. I’ve been here much longer than you have and I remember things. You only started University last year, and you need at least TWO years before you can apply to vet school. There is no way you could apply for, or be accepted into, vet school when you only have one year of University to your credit. You have posted numerous things that back up what I am saying:
"I’ll be going into Guelph University this year, and have plans of applying and (hopefully!) being accepted into the Ontario Veterinary College after two years of university."
"BTW I’m going into second year University in the fall – majoring in Zoology, hoping to be accepted into vet school" On 6/22/2001 (just 3 months later) you blatantly lied and posted the following: "I’ve taken 2 years undergraduate in Zoology at the University of Guelph, and I’ve just been recently accepted into the Ontario Veterinary College for the Fall 2001 semester. Needless to say, I’m extremely excited at the opportunity!" Recently accepted? How is that possible? Applications from (at a minimum) "second" year students were due by February 1, and the results of your school year were due by June 15. Decisions about and notifications to who is accepted were not made until mid to late July, so there is NO WAY you could have been accepted by June 22 (the date you posted the above), and especially not with only "one" year of University. According to the Vet School admissions policy, the earliest you could apply would be for the February 2002 deadline, and even then, you would just barely meet their minimum requirements for eligibility. This is despicable behavior on your part, especially considering that you have spent the last two days trying to convince someone that medication for epilepsy is a bad idea, and are doing so while making a fraudulent claim that you have "been accepted to vet school" so that some might assume your opinion is more valid. You have crossed the line, Kelly. Your lies and actions are inexcusable and beneath contempt. Megan "The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing." -Edmund Burke Learn The TRUTH About Declawing http://www.stopdeclaw.com Zuzu’s Cats Photo Album: http://albums.photopoint.com/j/AlbumList?u=244574
Response:
I’ll save you the heartache and will most > likely be un-subscribing from this newsgroup anyway. Dealing with the likes > of you two is really not worth my time, or any effort I put into this group.
geesh, this is gonna turn into one of these little skits that always goes on when someone starts thinking *they* are more important then purpose of the group….before long people will be begging little kelly to stay…finally she’ll relent and say "oh okay, i guess i’ll stay…it really doesn’t matter what some people think….as long as the rest of you support me and love me" save the drama for daytime tv…. best regards, connie
Response:
If people I respected would like proof, then I would be more than willing (my references letters from the vets I work with, my acceptence letter, etc.). But quite frankly Beth, I could give two shits about what you or Megan think and I have no respect for either of you. So why should I care? Anyway, this is ridiculous and my cat is really sick so I have more important things to worry about. I’ll save you the heartache and will most likely be un-subscribing from this newsgroup anyway. Dealing with the likes of you two is really not worth my time, or any effort I put into this group. Have a good one, Kelly — *When in doubt, See a Vet! – Nothing else substitutes for a professional.*
– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> Believe whatever you like Megan. I don’t have to prove anything to you or > anybody else. > Some fraudulent claims are more serious than others. Anyone claiming to be > a veterinarian, or a veterinary student, while giving advice about cat > health on a cat health newsgroup, really ought to be able to back their > claim up, IMO, but I don’t see how you possibly could do that, given the > information Megan obtained from the vet school about their eligibility > requirements. > How is falsely claiming to be a veterinary student (or even a soon-to-be > veterinary student) any different from falsely claiming to be a > veterinarian, except perhaps as a matter of degree? To try to deceive > others by making either claim is bad enough, but to do so in order to try to > get people to listen to your advice about their cats’ health is downright > reprehensible. It would be bad enough if you consistently exercised good > judgment and gave sound advice, but you exacerbate the problem by frequently > giving unsound advice. > You’re right in one respect, Kelly. You don’t have to prove anything on > Usenet. You aren’t bound by any legal constraints that I am aware of; > you’re free to make any claims about yourself that you want to. It’s just > too bad that you don’t appear to be bound by any ethical ones either, such > as telling the truth. So I guess it’s up to the rest of us to beware of > your claims and your advice, and to take both with a huge grain of salt. > There is an excellent object lesson here: No one should take anything they > read on a newsgroup at face value. It’s good to be reminded of that every > once in a while.
Response:
> Believe whatever you like Megan. I don’t have to prove anything to you or > anybody else.
Some fraudulent claims are more serious than others. Anyone claiming to be a veterinarian, or a veterinary student, while giving advice about cat health on a cat health newsgroup, really ought to be able to back their claim up, IMO, but I don’t see how you possibly could do that, given the information Megan obtained from the vet school about their eligibility requirements. How is falsely claiming to be a veterinary student (or even a soon-to-be veterinary student) any different from falsely claiming to be a veterinarian, except perhaps as a matter of degree? To try to deceive others by making either claim is bad enough, but to do so in order to try to get people to listen to your advice about their cats’ health is downright reprehensible. It would be bad enough if you consistently exercised good judgment and gave sound advice, but you exacerbate the problem by frequently giving unsound advice. You’re right in one respect, Kelly. You don’t have to prove anything on Usenet. You aren’t bound by any legal constraints that I am aware of; you’re free to make any claims about yourself that you want to. It’s just too bad that you don’t appear to be bound by any ethical ones either, such as telling the truth. So I guess it’s up to the rest of us to beware of your claims and your advice, and to take both with a huge grain of salt. There is an excellent object lesson here: No one should take anything they read on a newsgroup at face value. It’s good to be reminded of that every once in a while.
Response:
Hey you just proved my point! Thanks! Believe whatever you like Megan. I don’t have to prove anything to you or anybody else. Nor does anyone else in these newsgroups. I’m sorry that your so jealous of me, but that’s about all I’m sorry for. Have a nice life, Kelly — *When in doubt, See a Vet! – Nothing else substitutes for a professional.*
– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text ->I’m starting vet school this Sept, Beth & >yourself is a psychoobsessive twit who >enjoys prying into newsgroup members >personal lives and gives her ego a boost >by putting other people down. Who would >you be more apt to listen to? > I would listen to Beth. > Not some lying little twit who makes up stories to boost her credibiity, > and continuously posts false, sometimes harmful information. > You are not starting vet school, Kelly. I’ve been here much longer than > you have and I remember things. You only started University last year, > and you need at least TWO years before you can apply to vet school. > There is no way you could apply for, or be accepted into, vet school > when you only have one year of University to your credit. > You have posted numerous things that back up what I am saying: > "I’ll be going into Guelph University this year, and have plans of > applying and (hopefully!) being accepted into the Ontario Veterinary > College after two years of university." > "BTW I’m going into second year University in the fall – majoring in > Zoology, hoping to be accepted into vet school" > On 6/22/2001 (just 3 months later) you blatantly lied and posted the > following: > "I’ve taken 2 years undergraduate in Zoology at the University of > Guelph, and I’ve just been recently accepted into the Ontario Veterinary > College for the Fall 2001 semester. Needless to say, I’m extremely > excited at the opportunity!" > Recently accepted? How is that possible? Applications from (at a > minimum) "second" year students were due by February 1, and the results > of your school year were due by June 15. Decisions about and > notifications to who is accepted were not made until mid to late July, > so there is NO WAY you could have been accepted by June 22 (the date you > posted the above), and especially not with only "one" year of > University. According to the Vet School admissions policy, the earliest > you could apply would be for the February 2002 deadline, and even then, > you would just barely meet their minimum requirements for eligibility. > This is despicable behavior on your part, especially considering that > you have spent the last two days trying to convince someone that > medication for epilepsy is a bad idea, and are doing so while making a > fraudulent claim that you have "been accepted to vet school" so that > some might assume your opinion is more valid. > You have crossed the line, Kelly. > Your lies and actions are inexcusable and beneath contempt. > Megan > "The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do > nothing." > -Edmund Burke > Learn The TRUTH About Declawing > http://www.stopdeclaw.com > Zuzu’s Cats Photo Album: > http://albums.photopoint.com/j/AlbumList?u=244574
Response:
>I’m starting vet school this Sept, Beth & >yourself is a psychoobsessive twit who >enjoys prying into newsgroup members >personal lives and gives her ego a boost >by putting other people down. Who would >you be more apt to listen to?
I would listen to Beth. Not some lying little twit who makes up stories to boost her credibiity, and continuously posts false, sometimes harmful information. You are not starting vet school, Kelly. I’ve been here much longer than you have and I remember things. You only started University last year, and you need at least TWO years before you can apply to vet school. There is no way you could apply for, or be accepted into, vet school when you only have one year of University to your credit. You have posted numerous things that back up what I am saying:
"I’ll be going into Guelph University this year, and have plans of applying and (hopefully!) being accepted into the Ontario Veterinary College after two years of university."
"BTW I’m going into second year University in the fall – majoring in Zoology, hoping to be accepted into vet school" On 6/22/2001 (just 3 months later) you blatantly lied and posted the following: "I’ve taken 2 years undergraduate in Zoology at the University of Guelph, and I’ve just been recently accepted into the Ontario Veterinary College for the Fall 2001 semester. Needless to say, I’m extremely excited at the opportunity!" Recently accepted? How is that possible? Applications from (at a minimum) "second" year students were due by February 1, and the results of your school year were due by June 15. Decisions about and notifications to who is accepted were not made until mid to late July, so there is NO WAY you could have been accepted by June 22 (the date you posted the above), and especially not with only "one" year of University. According to the Vet School admissions policy, the earliest you could apply would be for the February 2002 deadline, and even then, you would just barely meet their minimum requirements for eligibility. This is despicable behavior on your part, especially considering that you have spent the last two days trying to convince someone that medication for epilepsy is a bad idea, and are doing so while making a fraudulent claim that you have "been accepted to vet school" so that some might assume your opinion is more valid. You have crossed the line, Kelly. Your lies and actions are inexcusable and beneath contempt. Megan "The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing." -Edmund Burke Learn The TRUTH About Declawing http://www.stopdeclaw.com Zuzu’s Cats Photo Album: http://albums.photopoint.com/j/AlbumList?u=244574
Response:
Related Posts